 |
Banning of nightclubs not in
interest of all
THE call to ban nightclubs or any other such moral
exhortations are indicators of moral fear, uncertainty and vigilantism
and therefore, necessitates the need to deal with these social problems
using objective, professional approaches.
On the one hand, there are liberalists and cosmopolitans who consciously
or unconsciously propagate the ideals of a global culture where cultural
practices and general ways of behaving, living and interacting with
different races and groups of people within and outside of a nation is
somewhat becoming homogenised in form and content and is inevitable.
What we are practising here is same or similar to what people in
Australia, America or Africa are practising. Societies are defined by
the type of ideology and common morality they hold as dear to their very
existence.
At times, we hear of “Islamic fundamentalism” or Melanesian “kastom” and
traditional culture. These are sources of ideology and common morality.
In an important way, common morality and ideology help to stabilise a
society despite an influx of external influences and imperative. Perhaps
this is where our moralists, in the form of political and religious
speeches, have stood for in order to preserve common sense as we know it
and a sane national mood.
An important consideration is that utterances by our political and
community leaders on moral issues need to be carefully weighed before
they are brought to the public’s attention.
Sometimes, these moral utterances can be biased, parochial and sound
ridiculous and may go against our democratic principles of liberalism,
social tolerance, respect for individual rights and freedom.
On one hand, we should understand that PNG is young, vibrant and rushing
into the microchip age with very little care and responsibility (or lack
of it). In a way, it is embracing the new world order by Papua New
Guineans.
On the other hand, the degree of uncertainty and disillusionment with
the new world order has prompted moralists to take a stand and embark on
a campaign to exhort the nation to find strength and meaning in our
indigenous culture and tumbuna pasin – not to mention our legacy of
Christianity as a source of comfort in trying times. This is the crux of
the matter now at hand.
Authorities should therefore deal with such issues in an objective
manner while at the same time, accommodating all the parties’ views and
arguments.
An important thing to remember is that PNG is a member of the global
community and as such, there are many shared international expectations
and values that we ought to observe and live by.
The call to ban nightclubs in PNG may be done with noble intent and
conservatives are at liberty to drum up national opinion and mood in
their favour.
I have no problem with that except that we may be likened to Islamic
societies whereby religious fundamentalism has been used to restrict
certain universal practices and ways of behaving.
Isn’t the call to ban nightclubs in PNG a form of religious and moral
fundamentalism or extremism?
To drum up support to find a shortcut to deal with complex socioeconomic
issues should not be pursued at all because the ramifications of such
short-sightedness are greater and long-lasting.
Many factors need to be identified so the approach should not be
simplistic. An important factor to consider is individual volition and
freedom – a question of choice.
These are the basic elements of a democratic society. But we all agree
too that the pressure to maintain our own unique identity and indigenous
culture is just as great in the face of global homogenisation.
To find a lasting solution, if not an accommodating approach that caters
for all the parties’ interests is our biggest hurdle. To say no to
nightclubs is too extreme and overzealous and becomes somewhat
ridiculous in the eyes of the international community.
To say that nightclubs promote promiscuity and cause serious social
problems in society (including HIV/AIDS) is too simplistic and a threat
to people who genuinely use those services as a means to enhance their
quality of life – this is the age of globalisation, so moralists and
conservatives need to wake up to this reality.
What would tourists and other international visitors – which we are so
eager to attract – think when they cannot find a social setting like a
nightclub to enhance their social interaction with the locals?
B.D. Kombako
Port Moresby
|
 |