|
 |
It is not a leader’s character to be selfish
RECENTLY, many letters to the editor
condemn the impending increase in perks and privileges of MPs. The
reason for this public chorus of disapproval is pretty obvious. If the
increase is passed in Parliament, the Act would become a corrupt piece
of legislation.
The enactment will undeniably serve the consumer greed of MPs, while the
interested of the commonwealth will become subdued.
Consumer greed is an insatiable desire and if citizens are rather silent
about it, almost half of the nation’s wealth will be ripped off by MPs.
The current budget allocates K10 million to each district; the money
obviously, will be at the disposal of MPs with a baggy cohort group
called the Joint District Budget and Priority Committee.
Experience showed that money in the control of MPs for rural development
never materialised in any form of tangible and sustainable development.
And if history has it, half of this money will end up in private
accounts of national parliamentarians.
It has shown over the years since independence that a career in politics
was the sure way of becoming an instant millionaire. The manner in which
many candidates see politics as a path to wealth and fame has destroyed
the real value of politics.
Increasingly people in PNG have cultivated a misleading notion of
politics as well as leadership. Thus, a major contributing factor toward
political decay is when MPs are elected by means of bribery, and they
think of recouping the money spent by digging deep into the coffers of
the State.
The recent increase in perks is a demonstration of this syndrome.
The other obvious factor for political decay is the mistaken
understanding of MPs concerning their roles and responsibilities.
It is imperative that politicians undergo training in leadership knowing
very well that many politicians assume leadership positions without
possessing leadership character and skill.
The first important characteristic of a leader is the ability to listen.
Listening to people is a very important role of a leader because any
decision a leader makes must emerge as a consensus and convergence of
people’s voice. Thus, listening skills goes deeper than the level of
verbal discourse.
Moreover, a leader must study the mood, the posture, read into what is
unexpressed, and overall try to sense the situation people are in.
Decision made in the comfort of an armchair does not reflect the true
wishes of the people, and may be done according to the stirring of
personal egos.
History discloses that monarchs were overthrown; revolution and anarchy
became widespread as a result of leaders enriching themselves to the
impoverishment of their people.
Political decadence is inevitable when MPs lose sight that they are
there of and for the people.
The second important character of the leader is the ability to be
equitable. A leader is not called to become selfish, but to share what
is common equally among the people he or she represents. Only a selfish
person receives a lion’s share of what belong to everyone.
The incident of leaders accumulating State wealth for themselves is an
act unbecoming of leaders. The recent example of MPs demanding an extra
K30 million onto their perks is unmerited and utterly disgraceful.
However, when looking at the PNG situation, politicians have become fat
cats, feting and squandering on people’s wealth without any sense of
shame. They have received a lion’s share of money to the neglect of the
common people – some even may not receive a single toea.
Since our Constitution is based on traditional wisdom and Christian
principle, an aspect of Christian leadership needs expounding. Any
church-goers will understand the saying of Jesus: “Whoever wants to be
first must be the servant of all.”
Servitude is characteristic of Christian leadership. Christians who are
elected or nominated into State institutions should become servants of
the people.
Moreover, MPs are given the mandate to serve the people in their
respective electorate.
However, this Christian concept of leadership took time to make an
appeal to common sense, and we have seen in history how oppressive and
violent people with political authority became.
Riches, power and fame were centred on few individuals to the exclusion
of others. The kings and nobles never conceived of being in positions to
serve. It was unimaginable for a medieval king to wash the feet of a
slave, despite the fact that the Christian scripture was widely read.
Thus, the action taken by Francis of Assisi and his followers at that
time was revolutionary and demonstrated to the noble class the
unimaginable character of political and Christian leadership.
What Francis of Assisi did was to champion the cause of the voiceless
and fight the poverty resulting in inequitable sharing of the produce of
the land.
The French revolution was in fact a revolt against riches and power in
the hands of very few greedy monarchs, and paved the way for democracy,
which is actually the triumph of people’s supremacy. It is really the
authority of millions of voiceless people making their stance felt.
With the increasing development towards democracy over the last 200
years, we are able to see the ultimate victory of people’s powers and
along with that came the improved understanding of what is meant to be a
Christian leader.
Christian leadership simply means that those put in position of
authority should see that power, dignity and the rights of every human
being is respected, protected and nourished – the very reason for the
existence of institutions of authority.
They have to see to it that the welfare of the people is sufficiently
catered for, and that there is order and harmony in society conducive
for happiness.
Among PNG politicians, we see them regress to some kind of medieval
nobility who continually try to accumulate wealth and fame; not by the
sword of chivalry this time, but by manipulative tactics employed to
bully the simple people’s mandate. Thus, greed among leaders is the
foundation for political decay in PNG.
Every five years, we vote in politicians who during that period have
become rich by squandering public funds for selfish ambitions.
The recent suggestion to increase perks and privileges is nothing more
than the disclosure of a political mindset developed since independence.
This mindset has to be altered for genuine political growth. Otherwise,
political decay is imminent.
The political stability professed by the current Government is not a
true reflection of growing episodes of anarchic behaviour both in rural
and urban areas where authority and law are fast disappearing into the
hand of thugs.
|
|