 |
Time for a PNG travel advisory
THERE has never been a case of avian flu infecting human beings in Papua New
Guinea.
The number of foreign tourists, and particularly Australians, who have been
the subject of rape or assault in PNG represents a tiny fraction of the
total of those offences committed.
Large scale volcanic eruptions likely to pose risks to tourists are few and
far between.
Few cases of tourists acquiring Japanese encephalitis in PNG have been so
far recorded.
And the rate of HIV/AIDS infection in PNG, reportedly below 2% of the
population, is markedly lower than that recorded in any African country.
Tourists should “boil all drinking water” – despite the many reliable
reports from test laboratories that have given treated PNG tap water an “A”
grade reading.
These are a handful of the many and varied concerns listed in the Australian
Foreign Affairs PNG travel advisory issued four days ago.
The latest edition of this notorious document continues to paint PNG as a
highly dangerous destination peopled by untrustworthy barbarians.
There are five categories of risks indicated for countries likely to be
visited by Australians.
The fifth security category issued by Australia’s DFAT simply advises “do
not travel.”
Next comes “reconsider your need to travel”.
And then we come next – travellers to our country must exercise a “high
degree of caution”.
We acknowledge the need for other countries to issue these travel
advisories.
If they’re compiled by those who have information based on in-depth analyses
of the situations likely to be encountered, they can provide a valuable
service to the travelling citizens of those countries.
What to make of this latest Australian offering?
We wonder whether the new minister for foreign affairs, the replacement for
the quixotic Alexander Downer, has seen his department’s journalistic
efforts of Feb 15.
If he has, and he approves the content of this advisory, then even the
faltering process so far employed in patching up the relationship between
PNG and its southern neighbour may be snuffed out.
We suggest that PNG should issue its own travel advisory for those few who
succeed in bucking the Australian entry system and travelling there.
The strong likelihood of meeting death or disfigurement in the middle of
Sydney’s entertainment hub of George Street when trying to catch the latest
movie should feature large.
The dangers posed in the back streets of Morata pale by comparison.
Then there should be a paragraph or two covering the very real danger of
being incinerated in a bushfire sweeping through the premier NSW tourist
area of the Blue Mountains.
Nasty sharks with a taste for gobbling up surfers on the famed Australian
beaches would rate a paragraph, as would crocodiles less amenable to film
cameras than those known to Mr Dundee.
Warnings of the Gold Coast’s periodic abandonment to “schoolies” celebrating
the end of the college year in a welter of alcohol, drugs, sex and broken
bottles are essential. Unwary tourists have frequently suffered grievous
bodily damage during these adolescent frolics.
Those who fancy an after-dinner stroll should avoid the streets of Sydney’s
Redfern; despite a recent apology, they would be wise to wander elsewhere.
And Papua New Guineans who seek to sample the much-flaunted “mateship” of
any Oz suburban pub should be warned of the life-threatening brawl that is
an inevitable part of the process.
HIV/AIDS down under is now sharply on the rise, and the sexual diseases that
can be contracted in the average King’s Cross bordello are among the most
exotic in the world.
If PNG travellers experience malaria while in Australia, most chemists will
not supply anti-malarials, but will tell them to go to the local general
practitioner who may well thrust them into the nearest hospital.
And asthmatics need to take a supply of puffers with them – unless they’re
prepared to play 20 questions with the local pharmacist, who will only
release Ventolin to them when convinced that the customer gasping for breath
at their counter is “genuine”.
We can only hope that the latest advisory does not reflect the attitudes of
the newly-installed Rudd government and that the very real targeting of PNG
by previous Australian administrations is quickly rectified.
|
 |