Monday April 02, 2007

 

Nation 
Business

 

Sports

  by Frank Senge Kolma                  

An inquiry likely to end under the carpet

THERE might be some legal technical hitch with the Moti inquiry and the manner in which it was conducted.
The judicial review granted last Friday by acting Chief Justice Sir Salamo Injia should establish that conclusively in due course.
For now, let us turn to the matter of whether or not it is the contents of the report ought to be published or not.
And what really is it that we are waiting with bated breath to find out?
Sir Salamo has ruled that until the judicial review is heard, the Government be restrained from taking any action on this matter and on persons that might be implicated.
That is as it should be but I get the feeling that it will not be too long before the whole of matter is swept under the carpet and be forgotten as so many other inquiries before it.
For one, it comes too close to the national general election. All anyone needs to defer and procrastinate before the courts long enough until the excitement of the elections takes over the national conscience.
It will join a long list of other shelved and forgotten inquiry reports.
Another expensive inquiry is going to end up with nothing to show for it.
If anyone were to look into the history of Royal Commissions of Inquiries in this country, we have a very sad record.
Only two inquiries on record, resulted in criminal prosecutions resulting in jail sentences and in substantial changes to existing policies and rules and regulations.
They were the Diaries Affair back in 1981which resulted in the jailing of a politician and the Inquiry into Aspects of the Forestry Industry in 1987, which resulted in wholesale changes of the forestry policies and rules and regulations at the time.
Others, sadly have been high on finance, emotion, hype and publicity, and low on effect and conclusively dealing with recommendations.
The historical landscape is littered with shelved inquiry reports that would make excellent reading and possible bestsellers if they were turned into novels.
I remember the inquiries into Wings Australia which became known as the Pelair Inquiry in March 1985 which ended in virtually nothing after weeks of investigation.
It turned out in the final analysis that the vital pieces of evidence, two gas tanks which could have been the conduit for the transportation of dangerous drugs had never passed customs checks and was not included in the inquiry.
The Prime Minister Sir Michael Somare and his then minister Karl Stack’s names were tainted pink during the inquiry but it ended up in nothing.
And the names can not be untainted – a constant
factor of inquiries that remain to this day.
A year later, during the float of Placer Pacific Shares, a senior partner in government in the People’s Progress Party appeared to use its position in Government to acquire tens of thousands of shares under the names of office staff and party workers.
The Placer Pacific Inquiry uncovered this but not much more.
The lion’s share of some 800,000 shares appeared to have disappeared into thin air.
PPP party leader Sir Julius Chan suffered public ridicule and negative publicity for the duration
of the inquiry but in a subsequent court action, was absolved of blame.
And then we have had the inquiries into the Port Moresby Water Deal, the Cairns Conservatory and Sydney Malangan Haus deals, the Poreporena Highway, the Sandline Affair, the NPF Affair and now the Moti Affair.
The Inquiry into Finance and Treasury is current as this article goes to press.
Together the inquiries would have cost tens of millions of kina and thousands of man hours.
Fairly or unfairly, so many prominent politicians and businessman have featured in these inquiries but we shall never know whether or not they are really guilty as alleged.
In the absence of concrete actions on them, we are left only with the innuendos and the allegations and that is what we will judge them on.
Now to the Moti Affair.
We need no inquiry to tell us certain facts.
Julian Moti, the designated attorney-general of Solomon Islands but an Australian citizen of Fijian Indian descent, was arrested by PNG police and charged in a PNG court for alleged child molestation.
The request for this action came from the Australian federal police with whom the PNG police share a close relationship and share information on international crime and drugs.
Julian Moti did not appear in court and there was a warrant of arrest out for him authorised by a PNG court.
He was in hiding and whilst in hiding, a certain scheme was concocted with the full knowledge of senior members of the security and intelligence organisations in PNG to move him from our shores in a clandestine operation.
That happened in the most dramatic manner when a PNG Defence Force aircraft and its crew were used to fly the man out to the Solomon Islands breaking our Civil Aviation regulations and Immigration laws in the process.
We are not asking to know if something illegal occurred. We know that already.
Laws were broken in the most brazen manner.
What we want to know and which this inquiry was about to tell us was: Who was responsible?
And all this flurry of legal nonsense before the courts is really to hide the faces and names of those people responsible.
They are running to hide – that is what is happening.
Let them kid us not.

 

       

Editorial
Column
Letters
Bottom Line
The Notebook
Building Blocks
Talking Point
My Say  
Asia watch  
Focus  
Special
Weekender  
Printing
Yearbook
Web Designing
 
 
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   

Copyright © 2003 [The National Online] Private Policy