|
Sports |
Rethink mining on track
I AM not happy with the manner in
which the Kokoda mining issue is being handled.
While it is true that the people of Kokoda, especially those
living close to the historical Kokoda Track, have seen little or
no tangible development, I do not feel this is reason enough to
allow mining exploration of the magnitude proposed by Frontier
Resources.
How would a five-metre buffer zone established on both sides of
the track be sufficient to prevent the rare flora and fauna found
along this track from being destroyed?
The track is not only of historical significance but is a
well-preserved eco-system which provides a sanctuary for numerous
species of plant and animal life not found anywhere else on earth.
The stakeholders have to be reminded that WWII was not fought
along this track alone, as relics of the battles fought are found
around the surrounding areas.
No amount of territorial buffers placed can restore the intrinsic
value that will be lost forever.
I do not quite agree with such explorations but I also understand
that the livelihood of people along this historical track has not
been given utmost consideration by the Australian government even
though it considers the Kokoda Track as an important symbol of its
history and identity.
The Papua New Guinea and Oro governments, which also stand to
benefit from this exploration have also not given much to the
people of Kokoda.
Essential services such as health, education and roads are poor
and must be addressed.
Landowners should not measure wealth and prosperity as defined in
Western terms.
Tony Manuda
Palmerston
New Zealand
 
|
