Nation
Business
Sports
Editorial
Column 1
Letters
Bottom Line
The Notebook
Tax Talk
Talking Point
My Say
Asia watch
Focus
Weekender
Printing
Yearbook
Web Designing
 
 
 
 
Thursday October 11, 2007

Court to decide today on 2 election petitions


By JOSHUA ARLO
NATIONAL Court judge Mark Sevua is expected to decide today whether to dismiss two election petitions filed against provincial governors Tom Olga and Anderson Agiru by their predecessors.
The petition against Mr Agiru, who is the governor of Southern Highlands, was filed by Hami Yawari, while former Western Highlands governor Paias Wingti filed the other against Mr Olga.
Counsel for Mr Wingti and Mr Olga argued over the issue of non-compliance of service before Justice Sevua on Tuesday, while in Mr Yawari’s petition, his counsel Philip Ame was blasted after he asked for more time to effect service on the second respondent.
He was asked why the issue of non-service was only being made known now when the parties had advised the court that a total of 115 witnesses would give evidence either orally or by affidavit.
Justice Sevua sat through five petitions that day.
At one point, Justice Sevua said he would not entertain applications for more time to comply with the amended election petition rules.
He said lawyers should read up on case laws and be prepared when they turned up court as it seemed he was wasting his time lecturing lawyers on how to proceed in court.
“I am sick and tired of lecturing lawyers,” he said.
Justice Sevua also warned lawyers not to become “legal prostitutes” by representing another party against a former client as it raised issues of conflict of interest in court.
Mr Yawari is claiming, amongst other things, that a memorandum of understanding signed between the Electoral Commission and Mr Agiru had influenced the result of the election for the Southern Highlands Regional Member.
He is also alleging that polling was not conducted in three areas of the Hela region.
Mr Wingti has alleged that the ballots for the regional seat were tampered with during counting.
Both want the court to declare the election of Mr Agiru and Mr Olga null and void.
Mr Olga’s counsel, Mr Harvey Nii, raised five points in his argument for the petition by Mr Wingti to be dismissed, which mainly alluded towards substantial evidence that there was no proper service.
Mr Wingti’s counsel Alfred Manase, argued that service was made through another party and that there was a receipt of acceptance.
The court should proceed to hear the petition, he said.
Another petition heard was of Alfred Luke Manase against Kandep Open Member Don Polye, who is the Transport and Works Minister.
Justice Sevua instructed Mr Polye’s counsel, Paulus Dowa, to comply with earlier orders of Sept 26 by Oct 16 before the returnable date next month.
 

          
 

 

           

General email: national@thenational.com.pg
Letters To Editor email: letters@thenational.com.pg
         The National web site
: www.thenational.com.pg

  Keeping you informed everyday!

        
 
 

 

 

 
 

Type In Your Name:

Type In Your E-mail:

Your Friend's E-mail:

Your Comments:

Receive copy: