 |
AFP: This is not a theme park
NewMatilda associate editor
MARNI CORDEL concludes his three-part series on the Australian
Federal Police.
THERE are chickens scratching the
dirt, the occasional goat or pig, and even a mock feast for the village
chief.
Australian Federal Police (AFP) officers who are about to be deployed on
overseas missions now get a simulated Pacific Island experience thanks
to the purpose-built, A$2.8 million complex at the Majura training
facility outside of Canberra.
The complex is a replica of an imagined township somewhere in the
Pacific Islands, complete with palm trees and thatched roofs.
Members of the AFP’s International Deployment Group (IDG) spend 35 days
in the simulated village prior to deployment, during which they learn
about cultural differences and life without modern facilities in a
scenario-based training programme.
Facing a storm of criticism for the conduct of its officers in the
Solomon Islands and Timor Leste in particular, the AFP has been forced
to significantly re-evaluate its approach to offshore policing over the
past three years – not just on the ground, but also in its role as what
AFP Commissioner Mick Keelty has referred to as the “deployable arm of
Australian government policy”.
As the IDG recruits to reach its target of 1,200 officers by June next
year, it is not only battling with an existing shortage of police in
Australia but also finding that it requires a diverse range of skills
that go beyond those found in your average police officer.
“Police by and large are trained to be police, not to be teachers or
trainers, and clearly that has posed some problems, and meant some
changes to training and selection,” Andrew Goldsmith, author of Policing
the Neighbourhood, said.
“A police officer from Belconnen is not necessarily naturally well
prepared to do capacity development (or training the locals) in Baucau,
Timor Leste.
“There is clear evidence that the IDG has learnt a lot in the last three
years and has modified
its curriculum to try and tackle issues such as local language and
cultural awareness but they are very difficult issues to tackle in a
short framework like a two or three-week – or even a month-long –
training course.”
When I interviewed IDG manager Commander Mark Walters, he was keen to
reiterate that the IDG was continually reviewing its training programme
and had made some significant improvements.
“We don’t assume we have everything right all of the time,” he said.
But beyond the extension of predeployment training this year from 12 to
35 days, Walters was unwilling or unable to go into specifics. He said
the IDG considered “cultural awareness as a very important issue”, and
that local language training for officers was “something we’ve been
focused on quite a bit in the last 12 to 18 months”.
But when questioned on what that meant in real terms, he admitted that
predeployment training was generic, not country specific, and that “the
actual acculturation occurs inside a country itself”.
Language training for the Solomon Islands, for example, “is not actually
broken down into a period of time where you learn Pidgin … where the
Pidgin does get picked up is in the Solomons”.
I made a number of follow-up calls and asked for more details but none
were forthcoming. No information could be given on the third-party
groups who provide cultural training at the Majura facility.
In fact, sources in the Solomon Islands gave more concrete examples of
what has changed in the past 12 months.
According to Dorothy Wickham, a journalist with local Solomons TV
service One News Ltd, Ramsi’s Participating Police Force (comprising
mostly of AFP officers) has noticeably shifted tactics since it
attracted widespread criticism over a number of police operations late
last year that smacked of political interference.
Appearances are important, Wickham said when we met a year ago, and the
Participating Police Force’s increasingly audacious actions (such as the
arrest of a government minister and a raid on the PM’s office conducted
by foreign police officers) were sending the wrong message to Solomon
Islanders.
But things had changed in the past year, Wickham said.
“There’s been a very big shift towards putting the Pacific Islands
police officers to the front. There’s an awareness at the top level of
Ramsi that it’s just good PR.
“There is also more of an understanding at the top level of AFP that
there has to be more cultural awareness among officers that come in, and
their induction on this end is pretty good now too.
“I also think the selection of police officers has changed. There’s a
different calibre of people coming in now. I think they actively look
for people who can work with different ethnic groupings who may come
from a community in Australia that has contact with Islanders, or
Aborigines, or whatever ethnic groupings it is. It shows in their
behaviour
and the way that they’ve been able to adjust to this situation.”
Wickham admitted that she was also being more careful in her criticisms
of Ramsi these days because she did not want them to be used by the
Solomon Islands government in their campaign to lessen Ramsi’s influence
in the country – often for self-serving purposes.
“Because of the political atmosphere between Australia and the Solomon
Islands now, I think sometimes we need to be careful about how we
criticise because of the way politicians are using these criticisms to
get what they want out of the situation,” she said.
The infamous Solomons attorney-general-on-the-run, Julian Moti, is a key
case in point.
It may well be that Moti is an inappropriate choice for attorney-general
and should face charges as a child sex offender. But for Australia to
use the Australian and Solomons criminal justice systems to attempt to
derail the Solomons government’s sovereign decision to appoint him to
the post is highly contentious and is a pointer to why the Australian
government has chosen the police – and not the military or an aid
agency – as its “deployable arm” in the Pacific.
Last year, in an address to the Australian National Press Club,
Commissioner Keelty spoke about a shift in the AFP’s role from impartial
police force to key player in the political process.
He was disarmingly honest in acknowledging that the AFP was being
challenged in its traditional, apolitical role under the Westminster
system.
“In my view, we need to adjust our thinking about the separation of
powers to the degree that we retain impartiality, and we remain
apolitical, but at the same time deliver on the government’s needs and
expectations in regard to foreign policy,” he said.
“If we are to consider that the offshore deployments are as much to do
with our own security … then we must accept that police have found
themselves in a role formerly, and almost solely, occupied by the
military.
“A defence force can be, and is, deployed by government without
necessarily affecting its apolitical standing, but taking on these new
roles for us means weaving a course through the politics in order to
keep our apolitical character.”
Keelty also lauded the Howard government’s establishment of the National
Security Committee, which had enabled a direct line between the head of
police and the inner executive.
“I can only speak from experience and observe that for me as
commissioner, this has been a very effective way to deal with policy
making,” he said.
There can be no doubt that the role of the Australian Federal Police is
changing – they are better armed and better funded than they have ever
been, and they are positioning themselves as the regional peacekeeping
force. But are they right organisation for the job?
“While one can find fault with some of the strategic choices and
operational rollouts and so on, the contextual difficulty of what is
being asked of the IDG, and indeed the AFP more generally, also has to
be put into the balance,” author Goldsmith said
“I’m interested in the question of whether we should be doing it at all,
but having accepted the realpolitik that this is the path Australia is
taking, then the question becomes: are we making things worse? Are we
doing more harm than we’re resolving? The answer is we’re doing harm and
we’re doing good.”
|
|