 |
PNG plans to review existing health
support programmes
PAPUA New Guinea is talking to donor agencies about
reviewing the existing health support programmes and coming up with
arrangements, which are best for PNG and can be managed by Papua New
Guineans, Health Secretary Dr Clement Malau said.
Dr Malau, in an interview with Radio Australia, said World Health
Organisation officials including donor partners like Australia and
others had been receptive to his plan.
Dr Malau said sometimes, when governments sign an agreement with donor
partners to fund a health programme like an immunisation programme, they
did not understand how it would work, and thought it was the donors
responsibility.
He said they must know how it would benefit the people and whether PNG
health workers could continue the programme once the donor partners
leave.
“Right now, I’m still concerned about how we negotiate counterpart
arrangements for example,” Dr Malau said.
“We need to look very clearly at whether the counterparting is
appropriate. If it’s appropriate, how would we manage that?
“In certain circumstances, we do have counterparts that may undermine
the capacity of the local person, because of the fact that the
counterpart may not be an appropriate match for the national
counterpart.”
PNG’s health sector depends heavily on foreign aid to provide basic
health services to its six million people.
Australia provides a bigger portion funds through AusAID to prevent the
spread of the HIV/AIDS and train health workers.
Dr Malau said he wanted the country’s dependence changed and donor
funded programmes that provided basic health care for people as past
governments had failed to understand the people’s basic health care
needs.
He said senior health officials did not communicate with rural health
workers in remote clinics and hospitals about what they lack to provide
basic health care to the people.
Dr Malau said there was no official information about the kind of
medical drugs, and equipment needed by nurses and doctors.
Basic medical drugs are not reaching the people, because those at the
local level are not aware or do not have the capacity to distribute the
drugs.
|
 |