 |
For shame, gentlemen
THE National warmly congratulates Betty Palaso on her appointment as
Commissioner-General of the Internal Revenue Commission. It is one tiny step
forward for the women of Papua New Guinea.
At the present rate of progress, gender equality within the public service
might be achieved by the turn of the next century. The present Government
has so far done nothing to change the unacceptable record of the previous
administration.
Women at decision-making level in the public sector reached an all-time low
under that government. There are 28 government departments. That should mean
at least half of the department secretaries should be women.
In addition, there are numerous statutory bodies and other quasi-government
authorities and instrumentalities that should be equally open to men and
women.
We challenge the Government to make appointments to those positions – and to
the middle management public service positions below them – based only on
merit and demonstrated performance. If that challenge is accepted, we can
expect to see a flood of highly skilled and competent women moving into
positions previously held exclusively by less competent men.
The challenge won’t be accepted, of course; there are many reasons why no
government today or in the immediate future would implement such a policy.
It has become almost inevitable that the absence of women in key government
positions has been seen as a cultural by-product.
Reams of academic theories have been published explaining that PNG women’s
traditional role has always been one of subservience and that men regard
women as property to be used as men see fit. That may well have explained
the situation 50 years ago; it seems to us less probable a reason today.
By independence, women were being encouraged to gain an education, seek jobs
in the newly developing public service, stand for Parliament and take up
positions of authority in unions, savings and loans societies and a wide
range of community-based employment.
Independence is 32 years behind us. In that time the number of better
educated women has grown sharply. Yet many of those well-qualified women do
not last long in the work place.
Those intent on maintaining an all-male hierarchy point to that fact and
proclaim women’s alleged inability to hold a job and withstand the pressures
and demands of senior levels of employment.
Not so.
The pressures and demands come from the husbands of those women, too many of
whom insist with violence and threats that “their” women should give up
their employment and tend the home fires.
A further potent reason is men’s fear of being sidelined by their partners
and finding themselves occupying inferior employment, while their wives are
promoted to supervisory and managerial positions.
There are still many men who swear that they would never under any
circumstances work for a woman boss. When asked why that should be so, they
are either stumped for reasons, or advance justifications that simply
confirm their sexist view of society.
For more than 30 years after independence, the number of men who grew up in
traditional villages and are now employed in public service or private
enterprise in our cities is decreasing sharply each year. Yet they still
cling to outmoded and inappropriate beliefs and patterns of behaviour when
confronted with successful and ambitious women in the workforce, or worse,
at home.
It may be that the time has come for women to fight for the establishment of
a statutory women’s council within the national government structure. Such a
council could be given the powers to recommend suitable women appointees for
every senior public service position that passes before the Public Services
Commission.
They could also appeal against male appointments that they deemed
unjustified. Such a council would make it increasingly difficult for the
government of the day to ignore the claims of women to senior appointments.
In passing, we note the tiny number of women Commissioners appointed to the
PSC since 1975 – another indicator of the contempt of male-dominated
governments towards educated women.
We wish Betty Palaso every possible success in her new role. But at the same
time we note that it has taken her 27 years of public service employment to
reach that position.
For shame, gentlemen.
|
 |