|

|
Trust fund abused
MORE than K200 million has gone missing from trust
accounts over the years, Opposition spokesman and former treasury and
finance minister Bart Philemon said yesterday.
Speaking during the Opposition’s reply to the 2008 Budget, Mr Philemon also
claimed that K3.4 billion was held in trust accounts, while a further K1.3
billion spread in trust accounts in four banks as of Oct 31, 2007.
He said this was according to Treasury Management Systems Report obtained
from the Department of Treasury.
He said the Treasury Management System Report as of Oct 31, 2007, showed
that funds in trust accounts had increased from K1.6 billion in 2006 to K2.5
billion this year.
That does not include the recently allocated K4 million per district in the
Supplementary Budget and the proposed K6 million per district in the 2008
budget. He said adding that K10 million per district (89 districts) to the
K2,481,700 (K2.4 billion) brings to total K3,371,700 (K3.4 billion)
Mr Philemon said there was another K1.3 billion spread in trust accounts in
four banks as at Oct 31, with K515 million in the Central Bank, K400.9
million in BSP, K197.1 in ANZ and K186.6 million in Westpac.n From Page 1
“What is the work plan of the Government on the implementation of the
projects from these funds? We are talking about K3.37 billion plus K1.3
billion, that’s K4.67 billion sitting in various trust accounts doing
nothing.
“I am stunned as someone who worked very hard to reduce the number of trust
accounts. During my term as treasurer and finance minister, over 2,000 trust
accounts were abolished and the funds were reined into consolidated
revenue.”
Mr Philemon said the danger of keeping money in trust accounts was that
there would be gross abuse on withdrawing for purposes other than those the
trust accounts were created for; flaunting of the financial delegation of
various bureaucratic heads and cabinet ministers (in other words, one
minister can direct bureaucrats to exceed their financial delegation); and
that there would be little regard for record keeping and monitoring of these
trust accounts.
He said he found there was a lot of abuse when he became minister in 2002.
Mr Philemon said based on NEC decision No 231/2003, an accounting adjustment
of K201.6 million was executed.
“That means we don’t know what happened to over K200 million that was spread
out in trust accounts over the years. What has this government done in the
past five years to ensure there is better monitoring and accounting of
future trust funds?
“We are on-track to repeat them – with ministers sitting as kingpins on the
procedure of access to these funds.”
Mr Philemon quoted Financial Instruction 4/2007, section 5.5 in respect of
the K10 million district allocations.
“A key requirement in the trust instrument of each of the supplementary
budget trusts is an agreement between ministers on the procedures to be
followed on the use of trust funds.
“While these agreements may vary (eg, specific restrictions unique to the
particular trust) the common requirements for all the trusts are set out in
the remainder of this financial instruction.”
He said in other words, Members were at the mercy of the ministers on the
release of their district funds. Ministers set the procedures, not
bureaucrats.
“And ministers may not necessarily have the know-how on the procedures. But
that’s not the full story.”
He said the financial instruction themselves would result in ministers
clashing with Section 47 of the Public Finance (Management) Act if their
procedures did not comply legally.
He said the bottom line was that major clashes would be the order of the day
between ministers, bureaucrats and the Public Finance (Management) Act and
Financial Instructions.
He pointed out that Financial Instructions were a subordinate piece of
legislation to the Public Finance Management Act.

|



 |