 |
Still skeptical on merits of spending
K1.2 billion
I APPRECIATE the gesture taken by Kaskus Kunda, the press
officer of the Ministry of Works, Transport and Civil Aviation (Dec 17). The
gesture was an effort to enlighten me and the public on issues he may have
felt I wasn’t sure of and/or appreciate that relates to the K1.2 billion
highway.
As every John Doe, I am enthused by an informative dialogue on this project
(in particular) as he (Kunda) stated is a “major impact project for the
country”. This process (open dialogue) enables or frees every John Doe of
the confusion that usually arises from an obvious lack of available
information for public consumption.
The lack of accessible information, in any form, on many developmental
projects within this country, has always been an issue.
In saying that, my concern still is (in addition to points that I raised in
my earlier letter in The National), we are spending approximately 15% of
this year’s budget on the construction of a national road, which is not
warranted under present conditions.
Further to this, there isn’t one national road that all forms of Government
can be proud of. This is the main point of my argument, given the status,
disgracefully inadequate as they are, of all major roads around the country.
I am still to be persuaded on the merits of spending K1.2 billion on an
additional “major national highway”, though that figure may be grossly
undervalued given the topographic features of this country.
This has been expounded by all and sundry and as such is not essentially
“arcane science”. He does incidentally “shoots himself in the foot” by
suggesting that this “highway” will complement the existing road network,
because there is hardly a “network of road” in this country, worthy of being
mentioned.
There is a “possibly” a network of road in Port Moresby, short lived as they
(roads) are where obscenely huge sums of money have been spent by every new
government.
I do appreciate the gesture, though.
Concerned expat
Via email
|
 |