 |
The making of a murder in Pakistan
By HASSAN ABBAS
THE assassination of Benazir Bhutto, the first Muslim woman to lead a Muslim
country, is a serious blow to Pakistan’s prospects for democracy and,
indeed, its viability as a state.
As chaos and confusion set in, we should not lose sight of president Pervez
Musharraf’s partial responsibility for this turn of events.
At the very least, he cannot be absolved from his government’s failure to
provide Bhutto with adequate security.
Instead, the opposition leader who had only recently returned to Pakistan
from exile had to pay with her life for courageously challenging extremists
of all stripes – from Al-Qaeda and Taliban to the country’s religious
political parties and military hardliners.
As heir to Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, the legendary democratic leader who was
hanged by Gen Muhammad Zia-ul-Haq’s government in 1979, Benazir emerged as a
symbol of resistance at a young age – but languished in jails and exile in
the 1980s.
Z.A. Bhutto’s legacy was empowerment of the impoverished and defence of
ordinary people’s rights amid feudalistic politics and military rule.
Rather than bowing to the military junta, he embraced the gallows.
Hours before his hanging, Benazir was allowed to see her father for the last
time, writing in her autobiography: “I told him on my oath in his death
cell, I would carry on his work.”
She largely lived up to the promise.
Her first stint as prime minister (1988-90) was brief and disorganised.
Lt-Gen Hamid Gul, the former inter-services intelligence (ISI) chief,
confirmed that he sponsored an alliance of right-wing political parties to
stop her from getting a parliamentary majority.
Information about Pakistan’s nuclear programme and ISI operations in
Afghanistan were out of her domain.
Her second term in office (1993-96) was longer and better, but her
government again fell early, owing to charges of mismanagement and
corruption.
In reality, machinations by the intelligence agencies also played a part.
The military had developed an entrenched distrust of her, given her position
as a popularly supported pro-Western leader who wanted peace with India.
After almost a decade in self-imposed exile, Benazir’s return to Pakistan in
October gave her a fresh political start.
Pakistan had changed, as military dictatorship and religious extremism in
the north played havoc with the fabric of society.
A tentative arrangement with Musharraf, together with Western support –
particularly from Britain and the US – eased her return, which hundreds of
thousands of people welcomed, though terrorists greeted her with a string of
suicide bombings.
Benazir’s contacts with Musharraf's military government drew criticism, but
she remained adamant that a return to democracy was possible only through a
transition in which Musharraf would give up his military post, become a
civilian head of state, and conduct free and fair elections.
To the dismay of some democratic forces, Benazir stayed the course even
after Musharraf imposed emergency rule on Nov 3 and removed the country’s
top judges to ensure his re-election.
Indeed, she even persuaded other important political leaders to participate
in the planned Jan 8 election, which she viewed as an opportunity to
challenge religious extremist forces in the public square.
She seized that opportunity by bravely traveling throughout the country,
despite serious threats to her life, arguing for a democratic and
pluralistic Pakistan.
One can understand why religious extremists like Al-Qaeda and Taliban would
target her, and the government claims that it is impossible to defend
against a suicide attack.
But Benazir was reportedly killed by a sharp shooter before the terrorist
blew himself up.
In the eyes of Pakistan’s people, and especially of Benazir’s supporters,
the intelligence services, either alone or in collaboration with extremists,
finally decided to eliminate her.
Whether or not the government was involved, the fact remains that Pakistan
has lost a desperately needed leader.
With Pakistan’s future in the balance, the West’s help and support will be
crucial, but that means recognising that Musharraf is not the only leader
who can resolve Pakistan’s myriad problems and manage the war on terror.
On the contrary, by nurturing the current environment of instability and
uncertainty, Musharraf himself must be regarded as one of Pakistan’s biggest
problems. – Project Syndicate
Note: The author served in the administrations of both prime minister
Benazir Bhutto and president Pervez Musharraf and is now a research Fellow
at Harvard University’s Kennedy School of Government and the author of
Pakistan’s Drift into Extremism: Allah, the Army and America’s War on
Terror.
|
|