Aust accused of policing separatism

WHEN politicians in Australia hail the success of Indonesia’s counter-terror forces in catching, charging – and often killing – the country’s top terror operatives, it is Detachment 88’s work they are talking about.
Detachment 88 is an elite counter-terror unit within the Indonesian national police that was formed in the aftermath of the 2002 Bali bombings.
It is funded and trained by Australia, and enjoys close cooperation with the Australian Federal Police (AFP).
Noordin Top, Dulmatin, Abu Bakar Bashir, Umar Patek have all been apprehended since the force became operational in 2003.
 Jakarta-based terror expert Sidney Jones calls them “the top of the top” – and Australia’s training and money have been instrumental in their success in disarming Indonesia’s significant terror network.
According to the department of foreign affairs and trade, Indonesian authorities have convicted more than 470 terrorists and their accomplices since 2000.
But there are growing concerns about what else they are using that deadly efficiency for – and although Australia trains and funds them, it exercises little control over their operations.
When Detachment 88 was accused in 2010 of torturing independence activists in the Indonesian province of Maluku, the AFP and Australian government said they were concerned about the allegations but had “no mandate to investigate the conduct of foreign police within another country”.
But the incident was not an isolated one – now, activists in West Papua claim Detachment 88 is being deployed to hunt down not only armed resistance fighters, but also civilians with ties to the independence movement, in what appears to be a growing campaign of intimidation.
I met Eric Sonindemi, a participant in last October’s third Papuan People’s Congress, in a cafe in Jakarta. He told me that soon after their arrival from Jakarta, a surge of Detachment 88 personnel was involved in the deadly attack on the congress, in which six people were killed and many others wounded.
“Most of the security forces were in plain clothes but they weren’t really concealing their weapons – they were sort of showing off,” he said.
On the last day of congress, Sonindemi was as surprised as other participants when the police and military opened fire because the gathering had been peaceful.
“Everyone thought it was going to be safe because the event ended peacefully and (congress leader) Forkorus Yaboisembut thanked the police and Indonesia for their support.
“People went home thinking they were safe,” he said.
But, then, security forces began firing indiscriminately into the dwindling crowd.
“I was in a nearby monastery when the shooting started – which wasn’t until about 30-45 minutes after the congress had ended,” Sonindemi said.
“I hid in one of the brothers’ rooms and put on one of his robes, pretending to be a student. Soon the fully-armed police and military arrived. They used tear gas and threatened to ransack the place before taking away a number of people, who were all told to squat and crawl towards the sports field.
“Hundreds of people were detained that night and many of them were beaten in detention. I spoke to one person who had a gash in his head, a broken nose and bruises on his face. He had been beaten with the butt of a rifle by a policeman.
“He was subsequently released and never charged with any crime.”
Sonindemi explains that the security situation in Papua has “really been heating up” since August last year.
“Before August, the police and military would not come in big numbers if there was a public rally. That has changed now.”
According to Jakarta Globe journalist Nivell Rayda, who has been investigating Detachment 88, there has been a marked shift by the force in recent months towards policing “separatism” – rather than terrorism.
When I spoke to Rayda last week in the Jakarta Globe newsroom, he said he believed this was because Indonesia had not had a major terror attack since the second JW Marriott bombing in 2009.
He said he noticed a similar trend between 2005 and 2009 when there was also a period of relative calm.
“Detachment 88 being somewhat of an elite unit, being funded and trained by foreign countries … they just lay dormant – their resources, their equipment and their tactical abilities, and investigation techniques just laying dormant for years,” he said.
It was during this period that the unit was involved in the torture of local independence activists in Maluku.
“In 2009, we had another major attack but, since then, we have arrested nearly all the major players and terrorism suspects. There haven’t really been any major terrorism events taking shape and it looks like the pattern seems to repeat itself.
“Detachment 88 has been engaging once more in non-terrorism issues, including (counter) separatism,” he said.
Rayda agrees that Detachment 88 is not only pursuing armed resistance fighters, and cites a case in August last year in Nafri, Papua, in which two young girls were detained among a group of 15 people after a fatal shooting attack on a public minivan.
“These 15 people – including a seven and an eight-year-girl – were tortured. They were arbitrarily detained and treated inhumanely.
“The following day, they released 13 of them. Only two of them were responsible for the shooting. The other 13 were innocent but were beaten as well.”
Sonindemi said mass arrests were a common tactic used by police in Papua to intimidate people and weed out the perpetrators.
A Jakarta-based security analyst, who asked not to be named, admitted that they held concerns about Detachment 88’s loose definition of terrorism – but claimed the force was “moving away from (policing separatism) now”.
“Detachment 88 has been sent to Papua in certain cases where the local police did not have investigative skills, but it is more to help in the investigations than to engage in raids,” the analyst said.
“The exception to that was the death of (Free Papua Movement leader) Kelly Kwalik in December 2010, which did involve Detachment 88.”
But Rayda disagrees.
When he asked the Indonesian national police why Detachment 88 was involved in raids against Free Papua Movement  (OPM) members that displaced thousands of villagers in Papua’s Paniai in December last year, he said the police were quite upfront about the fact that they believed “terrorism is not only limited to bombings and militants and stuff like that. It also extends to separatism”.
An Australian-funded and trained elite counter-separatist force?
This was not the Australian government’s intention when it began pouring millions of dollars into the Indonesian counter-terror effort after the Bali bombings.
Both the 2002 MoU with Indonesia on combating international terrorism, and the MoU on police cooperation between the two countries, focus firmly on transnational, not local, crime – and the AFP says Detachment 88 has not sought assistance from Australia in any investigations or operations to counter internal separatist movements.
However, the Australians do admit to working closely with the Indonesian police at the Jakarta headquarters where Detachment 88 is now controlled.
New Matilda asked the AFP how much they know about Detachment 88’s operations before they take place.
We also asked the Home Affairs Minister Jason Clare whether Australia condoned a definition of terrorism that included peaceful expressions of dissent.
We did not receive a response.