MPs should try harder for their people

Letters

TRYING to develop electorates in remote PNG is a difficult, and often sad, task.
Geographical features and landscapes make some of these far-reach electorates hard to develop.
Coupled with this, natural disasters such as landslides, floods or unexpected tidal changes are also make it hard for MPs to bring change to their electorates.
Despite this, there are some MPs who try their best to deliver impact projects in an effort to bring change to their people.
Imagine the task ahead for electorate as Jimi, Obura-Wonenara, Menyamya, Goilala, Usino-Bundi and a few others, including the atolls and islands.
For MPs of town and city electorates, including those that are in rural areas but still accessible, they should not have any excuses as to why they are not delivering impact projects within their five-year terms.
Their electorate should be three or four times ahead than those harder to reach.
For performing MPs in disadvantaged and remote electorates, your honest conduct and faithful heart will be rewarded in one way or another by both people and the Creator.

Paul Minga