‘Sacrificial lamb’ not a good name

Letters

I AM disturbed by a Government minister describing front-line health workers a sacrificial lamb as very disrespectful and distasteful in the present context. Especially, given the government’s disorganised and disoriented organisation of its response to Covid-19.
The minister was all wrong to say that the front-line health workers would become ‘sacrificial lambs’ in the fight against Covid-19.
He should rephrase and say, because over the years, the governments have failed to upgrade the health infrastructure which has resulted in the dilapidated state of the health infrastructure and disorganised administration, the health workers would take the risk.
It is wrong for you as a state minister to categorically give them names as sacrificial lamb.
These are not your guinea pigs for experiment with some untested personal protective equipment in exchange of huge amounts of money against the pretext technical support for the Covid-19 endemic.
Your labelling is wrong, distasteful and demeaning of the professional dignity of the front-line health workers in Bougainville and rest of PNG. You owe them an apology or you should just simply resign.
It’s very silly for a national leader to make mocking statements like this when the government has over the years failed to give priority to the health sector.

Kumbaolkal Kep

One thought on “‘Sacrificial lamb’ not a good name

  • The phrase “sacrificial lamb” may be used to address the danger lay ahead for the medical officers would face if the country comes into full-blown covid19 pandemic. The tone of the context is reasonable for them (medical officer) because it’s more like they are taking the risks for others. However, religiously may be wrong to use the phrase during the Lenten season where the Son of Man came to sacrifice for the world. Otherwise, lexically the phrase is fitting for the medical officers’ efforts.

Comments are closed.