Social media need better rules

THE media’s job in maintaining equilibrium between truth and public perception and in ensuring always to remain just and objective cannot be overstated.
For certain people, including politicians, public perception is almost everything and heavily dependent on portrayal by the media.
Papua New Guinea’s mainstream media has today taken on an undeclared competitor.
In an ideal scenario, the social media, via internet applications and the multitude of local blogs must necessarily complement the traditional media.
Where mainstream newspapers, radio and television are inhibited by situations such as geographical location or censorship and commercial considerations, the social media can and should be the available option.
However, recent developments have given rise to criticisms against the abuse of social media in spreading defamatory information, lies and half-truths.
Where such abuse results in defaming other individuals and public office holders it should be of concern.
What’s worse, the perpetrators of such abuse sometimes remain anonymous or hide behind pen names or pseudonyms.
Parliament has passed the Cybercrime Code Act, which applies to defamation, cyber security, spam, hacking, and forgery and computer fraud
The intent is not to control the media but there must be some proper mechanisms in place to make people responsible when they are using social media to attack others. We agree that every Papua New Guinean has the qualified right to broadcast or publish and to partake in a public assembly.
However, that comes with responsibility as well, which is what is lacking in the social media at the moment.
Keeping tabs on social media is necessary yet at the same time, we in the mainstream media might want to do some soul-searching as well.
Some common questions being asked about the roles of these two strands of media include:

• Is the social media venturing into a grey area where the mainstream media is expected to but is either failing or being restricted by the laws on libel and defamation?
• Are the country’s newspapers, television and radio stations not doing enough for some of their readers who would rather educate themselves by using the freedom provided by social media?

Someone has to take on the responsibility of telling the truth about public issues and controversies and that is the mainstream media’s role to extract truth from public officials or is it incumbent upon them to provide it?
Social media is a vital source of information and education. Used correctly and with proper control mechanisms, it can result in positive development for the individual as well as the community at large. The public might want to ask whether to take social media seriously as a source of information and education.
Some say readers don’t seem to really care about what organisation they’re getting their news from, or what device they’re reading it on; what matters is the news itself. Elsewhere in the world, governments and NGOs have successfully used social media to transmit vital information for social and economic development.
Unfortunately, social media networks in PNG have been thriving on conspiracy theories and is being used by people to vent their hatred and malice towards others.
There is, however, reason to believe that we need some monitoring mechanism now to avoid serious issues later.