Tips to help students search online when studying from home

AT the height of the Coronavirus (Covid-19) pandemic, school closures meant more than 90 per cent of the world’s learners had to study virtually or from home.
The internet, an invaluable educational tool, has, therefore, become more important for students.
One of students’ most common internet activities, both in schools and in home schooling, is online searching.
This means teachers and those parents currently standing in for teachers need to help students develop skills for searching online.
So what can parents do to support their children when tasks sent home from school require them to search for information online?
What can they do to extend such work for gifted students or when the work sent home runs out?
Teachers and parents can have an influence on a child’s internet skills.
Indeed, their search success is related to the amount of adult guidance and explicit instruction they receive.
Unfortunately, research suggests some teachers don’t offer such explicit instruction.
Some have trouble structuring (and providing support for) student online search tasks that go beyond lower-order skills.
Evidence exists of a lack of search skills among teachers and parents themselves.
The following three tips may help.

Focus on “learning to search” as well as “searching to learning”
Making the “invisible” processes behind searches more visible improves the online information-seeking of teachers and students.
In this way, educators (be they temporary or professional) should design activities that foreground the search process itself.
This makes students more aware of what goes on “behind the scenes” of a search and of their ability to affect these processes.
How might you do this?
In one Queensland study, students were asked to sort 12 picture cards.
The cards were designed so three “categories” – animals, transport modes and countries – were obvious at first.
Students easily sorted the cards into these categories.
But they were then challenged to recognise any other sorting options, much like Google does every second of every day. When “kangaroo” was removed from the “animals” pile and placed alongside “Australia” instead, for example, students were quick to assemble the remaining cards in a similar fashion.
This activity encouraged discussions about how many different ways, not 12, but, 200 million cards – or websites – could be sorted.
It’s a reminder of how important it is to clearly specify what you want from Google, helping it to sort its 200 million websites.

Become more critical users of the web
Educators sometimes set tasks that are too broad for students and likely to return millions of search results.
Many will probably be irrelevant or inaccurate. Teachers may also set tasks that encourage students to use Google as an encyclopedia, which requires only passive lower-order learning.
If we, instead, want students to engage in higher-order thinking, greater structuring of search tasks is needed.
Educators can start this by setting specific requirements for the results students work with.
Perhaps ask them to find one website from Australia (try adding “site: .au” to the end of queries) and one from England – this could be particularly interesting around the time The Ashes are played.
Perhaps students are told to find some sources from before the year 2000, and others from the previous 12 months (select “tools” then “any time” in the dropdown menu).
Asking students to purposefully find websites with conflicting information and to describe how they decided which to believe requires that they compare, evaluate and analyse.
The number of results a search engine returns can help indicate the quality of your query and make finding reliable information more efficient.
In school, students report that they typically don’t consider the number of results returned and have little experience in limiting or increasing these results.
In Australian home-schooling too, parent-educators and students rank “limiting/expanding searches” as one of the hardest steps in search.
Now that students know a little more about how Google must sort websites, ask them to alter their query to rearrange the top five or 10 results returned.
Challenge them to reduce the (likely millions of) results returned to 10,000, 1000 or 10.
Students explain that when it is only the final product or outcome of searching that “counts” or is graded, their focus is upon that and never the search process itself.
This changes when tasks are more structured and specific requirements are given.
Students then focus more upon gathering quality information.

Shift your thinking about search
Attitudes have proven more important than available resources or teacher skill when it comes to increasing students’ authentic technology-enabled learning. – The NewsDaily