Court asked to clarify vote

PRIME Minister Peter O’Neill has asked the Supreme Court to ensure clarity of constitutional and legal processes in relation to the process for a proposed vote of no confidence.
In a statement yesterday, he said “events over the past weeks” had led to “confusion in the constitutional process regarding the withdrawal of a notice of motion of no confidence”.
He has therefore filed an application to the Supreme Court to interpret Sections 99, 111, 142 and 145 of the Constitution.
“The recent lodgment and subsequent withdrawal of a motion for a vote of no confidence is unprecedented in the history of our Parliament,” he said.
“The lodgment of a motion of no confidence is a serious constitutional process. This is being treated disrespectfully as a negotiating tool in a numbers game, and the position of prime minister should not be offered as a bribe to cross the floor of Parliament.
“As the Government we have an obligation to ensure that correct processes and the rule of law is followed.
“I am seeking the Supreme Court’s interpretation of relevant legislation to ensure proper guidelines are set and followed, and this is in the interest of all parties.”
The court process comes as Parliament prepares to resume sitting today, with 67 MPs in the Opposition camp ready to force a change of government.
“This is important in the current situation where parties not mandated by the people are seeking to intervene and change the rules and provisions in the Organic Law on the Integrity of Political Parties and Candidates.
“These applications are necessary to prevent any legal motions that are an abuse of integrity laws and the Constitution.”