Election culture different from past

PAPUA New Guinea, once being under the reign of former colonial master, knew nothing about political ideology constituted of a well-structured and corruption-free government.
The late Grand Chief Sir Michael Somare then made his dream of attaining independence from Australia known.
With the birth of a new nation, cultures and tradition slowly changed as years passed with the introduction of Western cultures mixed with local traditions.
Among other changes, the election culture has changed as well.
Most Papua New Guineans feel that they have to pay people to gain favours.
Some public servants accept bribes to provide service to the people.
Turning our view on elections, money becomes the fundamental tool for success in election.
If you do not have money, you become a water boy hoping to have your name listed in the final squad for a rugby match.
Unfortunately, you become a weak candidate competing against millionaires.
The 1980’s and 1990’s election culture is slowly eroding.
The practice of buying votes, making name lists and giving thousands of kina to tribes and communities is increasingly evident in the Highlands with the “big name” mentality in connection to the traditional definition of a Highlands leader.
This year’s election is unpredictable.
We do not know what will happen.
Candidates are amassing money for their campaigns.
At such a time, an increase in cash flow will be seen at the grassroots level.
This is something that our ancestors knew nothing of.

Justin Max Torono,
Kuli Kombu Village