PNG, Australia ‘love affair’

THE historical relationship between PNG and Australia has often been marred by a perceived paternalistic attitude on the part of Australia towards PNG.
As a proud Papua New Guinean, I believe it is imperative to reflect on this relationship and advocate for a more equitable and respectful partnership between our two countries.
As I watched on social media videos of my own Prime Minister James Marape bravely walking behind his Australian colleague Anthony Albanese along the tough Kokoda Track, and later talking briefly to the Australian media during a short breather, it dawned on me the importance of commemorating Anzac Day.
It also brought to light the last battle of the Kokoda.
But then, something melancholy also hit me. While we will have this annual memorable event with Australia, the media will always tend to portray Aussie soldiers at Kokoda as heroes of the last war with Japan, but our part will always be remembered in Aussie wartime folklore as those “forgotten brave village boy carriers” who saved many Australian lives.
Fast forward to today, this sad paternalistic picture of Aussies and PNG still remains unchanged for nearly 200 years. Nearly two centuries of our relationship, both before and after the last Pacific War, the value of Australia’s legacy is still marginal in terms of real development in PNG.
It just seems still so biased and unfair to these poor village boy carriers and the sacrifices they made a long time ago.
The characterisation of PNG as nothing more than a “village boy carrier” during World War II is not only inaccurate but is also deeply offensive.
PNG’s contributions during that time were significant and should be recognised as such, rather than to be reduced to stereotypes.
It is essential to acknowledge the bravery and sacrifices of the PNG people during the war and honor their memory with the dignity they deserve.
Australia’s historical paternalistic approach towards PNG has perpetuated a dependency mindset, hindering PNG’s progress towards self-reliance and self-determination.
While assistance and cooperation between nations are essential, they should be based on mutual respect and equality. PNG is a sovereign nation with its own unique culture, history and aspirations, and it is time for Australia to recognise and respect that.
The comparison with Fiji’s successful transition to becoming its own republic underscores the potential benefits of PNG pursuing a similar path.
Independence grants nations the freedom to shape their destiny and make decisions that align with their interests. By breaking away from Australia’s patronising view, PNG can assert its sovereignty and chart a course that reflects the aspirations and priorities of its people.
However, the journey towards Independence requires careful planning and consideration. PNG must ensure it has the necessary infrastructure, institutions and capacity to govern effectively as a sovereign nation.
Additionally, fostering regional cooperation and partnerships can provide valuable support during the transition process.
It is essential for PNG to engage in constructive dialogue with Australia to redefine their relationship based on mutual respect and cooperation.
Australia should acknowledge PNG as an equal partner and support its efforts towards self-determination and nation-building.
This shift in mindset and approach can pave the way for a more equitable and beneficial relationship between the two nations.
In conclusion, PNG must move on from Australia’s patronising view towards its people and country to assert its sovereignty and pursue its own path towards development and prosperity.
By breaking away from historical dependencies and stereotypes, PNG can emerge as a confident and respected member of the global community, capable of shaping its destiny on its own terms.

Reginald Renagi