Up to Marape and his advisors

EVERYONE is demanding change of new government and requires Prime Minister James Marape to create history by resigning during vote of no-confidence.
Which I believe most criticism labelled against his office will not work out the way people may pursue.
Many citizens and leaders are complaining about the significant deficiencies in the Pangu-run government, and I share the perspective of those who advocate for dissolving the ruling dynasty.
Marape is the current Prime Minister of Papua New Guinea.
A vote of no-confidence is a mechanism utilised by parliamentary systems to test the support of the sitting Government.
If a majority of lawmakers vote against the Government, it may lead to the resignation of the prime minister and potentially trigger a new election.
The decision for any leader to resign during a vote of no-confidence is a complex one that involves various factors such as political considerations, public sentiment, and strategic calculations.
Ultimately, it is up to Marape and his advisors to determine the best course of action based on the circumstances at hand.
Resignations by leaders in such situations can be viewed as a way to allow for a peaceful transition of power or as a means of taking responsibility for perceived shortcomings.
However, whether Marape decides to resign or not is a decision only he can make based on his own assessment of the political landscape and his priorities as a leader.
For us and anyone to stand as advocate for change of new government must completely study situations surrounding the leadership of this country.
It’s essential to follow reliable news sources for the most up-to-date information on political developments in Papua New Guinea.

Nelson Wandi