Elections now about money

WHAT comes to the minds of voters in other parts of the world when election time nears in their country is different to what Papua New Guineans think when we have elections here.
Interestingly, PNG politics’ landscape has changed over the years and so has the mentality of voters.
Most voters these days, when they hear the words “election” and “candidate”, automatically think about money.
This practice of handing out cash for votes has been happening for so long that it has changed peoples’ perception and thinking about elections – instead of it being about voting a leader who will deliver service and serve the people, it’s now about a free handout.
From past and present observations, we can say only 10 per cent or so voters will be casting votes considering a candidate with an ideal policy, qualifications, reputation, standing or performance.
While the other 90 per cent will be casting their votes for whichever candidate offers them money and other material stuffs.
Elections now have become much more expensive and, unlike before, it isn’t as easy for just anyone to take part in.
With the revolution in PNG political landscape, voters now tend to exchange votes for money and gifts unlike in the 70s and 80s where votes were earned and not traded.
Well, with the present scenario, this sets a precedent that is not as conducive for any citizen to contest, especially the below average and middle-class Papua New Guineans.
This has now set a new precedent – aspiring politicians must consider the implications before exercising their democratic rights in future elections.

Paul Minga
Port Moresby